Skip navigation
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/16046
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_BrazilianScientificJournals.pdf809,9 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Título: Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journals Systems (OJS) : a quality analysis
Autor(es): Guimarães, Luisa Veras de Sandes
Costa, Sely Maria de Souza
Assunto: Periódicos científicos
Periódicos eletrônicos
Acesso aberto à informação
Data de publicação: Jan-2012
Editora: FEA USP
Referência: GUIMARÃES, Luisa Veras de Sandes; COSTA, Sely Maria de Souza. Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journals Systems (OJS): a quality analysis. Revista de Gestão da Tecnologia e Sistemas de Informação (Online), v. 9, n. 1, p. 61-88, jan./abr. 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.jistem.fea.usp.br/index.php/jistem/article/view/10.4301%252FS1807-17752012000100004/292>. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2014. doi 10.4301/S1807-17752012000100004.
Resumo: This study aims to assess the quality of Brazilian journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS) in order to be published. For this purpose, the main criteria used to assess quality were sought in the available literature, and a selection was made of those considered to be of great relevance. The universe of the research was comprised of journals that were correctly registered under their respective subject heading in the system website by June 2010, a total of 236. The sample’s nature is intentional and, according to the established criteria, 78 journals were selected for the study. The quality aspects evaluated were: editorial board, authors, rules for article submission, peer review, age, format, language of publication and the journal impact. The criteria were assessed by indicating the presence/absence of the quality indicator or by attributing a poor/reasonable/good, quality scale, according to the criterion assessed. The results indicate that the criteria established for authors, rules for article submission, and format were positively evaluated. The editorial board was also positively assessed, although 38% of the journals analysed did not present the composition of this group on their websites. The peer review criterion was negatively assessed, since only 17% of the journals correctly inform how the article evaluation process occurs and what criteria are used in the assessment of the submitted articles. Furthermore, it was identified the existence of a moderate positive relation between the H-index of the journals and their ages, and that there is no correlation between the language of article publication and the H-index of the journals.
Unidade Acadêmica: Faculdade de Ciência da Informação (FCI)
Licença: JISTEM - Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. http://www.jistem.fea.usp.br/index.php/jistem/article/view/10.4301%252FS1807-17752012000100004. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2014.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752012000100004
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro completo do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.