Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
dc.contributor.author | Slobodian, Veronica | - |
dc.contributor.author | Soares, Karla D. A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Falaschi, Rafaela L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Prado, Laura R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Camelier, Priscila | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guedes, Thaís B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leal, Laura C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hsiou, Annie S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Del-Rio, Glaucia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Costa, Eliza R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pereira, Karla R.C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | D’Angiolella, Annelise B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sousa, Shirliane de A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Diele-Viegas, Luisa M. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T14:18:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-14T14:18:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | SLOBODIAN, Veronica et al. Why we shouldn’t blame women for gender disparity in academia: perspectives of women in zoology. Zoologia (Curitiba), v. 38, e61968, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.38.e61968. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/zool/a/ysXmkL5N6qrrP4HW7Kwh6DM/?lang=en#. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2021. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/41163 | - |
dc.language.iso | Inglês | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia; Pensoft Publishers | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
dc.title | Why we shouldn’t blame women for gender disparity in academia : perspectives of women in zoology | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keyword | Diversidade | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keyword | Mulheres na ciência | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keyword | Gênero | pt_BR |
dc.rights.license | (CC BY) | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.38.e61968 | pt_BR |
dc.description.abstract1 | The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which
suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the
success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most
relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second,
we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity
policies are positively changing our field. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4754-5871 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-495X | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3046-5744 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-2824 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1228-0076 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3318-7193 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-8901 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6191 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7212-8474 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1760-1756 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-4627 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4529-524X | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7230-6859 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9225-4678 | pt_BR |
Aparece nas coleções: | Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins
|