Skip navigation
Universidade de Brasília
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/43472
Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRajão, Raoni-
dc.contributor.authorNobre, Antonio Donato-
dc.contributor.authorCunha, Evandro Landulfo Teixeira Paradela-
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Tiago Ribeiro-
dc.contributor.authorMarcolino, Camilla-
dc.contributor.authorSoares-Filho, Britaldo-
dc.contributor.authorSparovek, Gerd-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Ricardo R.-
dc.contributor.authorValera, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorBustamante, Mercedes Maria da Cunha-
dc.contributor.authorNobre, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorLima, Letícia Santos de-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-14T22:08:56Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-14T22:08:56Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-02-
dc.identifier.citationRAJÃO, Raoni et al. The risk of fake controversies for Brazilian environmental policies. Biological Conservation, v. 266, art. 109447, p. 1 - 11, fev. 2022. DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109447. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320721004997?via%3Dihub . Acesso em: 14 abr. 2022.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/43472-
dc.language.isoInglêspt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.relation.isbasedonhttps://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/44486-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.titleThe risk of fake controversies for Brazilian environmental policiespt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordPolítica pública - Brasilpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordPolíticas ambientaispt_BR
dc.subject.keywordMeio ambientept_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109447pt_BR
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320721004997?via%3Dihubpt_BR
dc.description.abstract1Fake controversies have influenced policy making on health and environmental issues for decades, resulting in major implementation setbacks worldwide. As a case study, in this paper we examine fake controversies produced by a small group of active Brazilian researchers that have seriously impacted environmental conservation, particularly in issues related to deforestation and climate change. Based on the literature, we develop a typology of strategies deployed in fake controversies, which include manufacturing uncertainty, misusing scientific credentials, and disregarding scientific literature. Afterwards, we examine the influence of this group of contrarians at the National Congress. We then analyze the fake controversies promoted by these contrarians and argue that, to properly understand them, we need to consider a strategy so far overlooked in the literature: the manufacture of “pseudo-facts”, namely, affirmations at odds with the established literature but that strives to appear as scientific facts. Unlike other contexts, in which contrarians have mainly sought to cast doubt on consensual issues by arguing that there are still considerable uncertainties surrounding them, in Brazil pseudo-facts on deforestation have been produced and published outside the peer-reviewed literature. We conclude the study with recommendations on how to oppose fake scientific controversies that threaten environmental conservation in general.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.