Skip navigation
Universidade de Brasília
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/48549
Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFontana, Marcele Elisa-
dc.contributor.authorLevino, Natallya de Almeida-
dc.contributor.authorGuarnieri, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorSalehi, Sattar-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-04T19:12:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-04T19:12:24Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-
dc.identifier.citationFONTANA, Marcele Elisa et al. Using group decision-making to assess the negative environmental, social and economic impacts of unstable rock salt mines in Maceio, Brazil. The Extractive Industries and Society, v. 16, 101360, dez. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101360.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48549-
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.pt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.titleUsing group decision-making to assess the negative environmental, social and economic impacts of unstable rock salt mines in Maceio, Brazilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.subject.keywordIndústrias extrativaspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordCatástrofes industriaispt_BR
dc.subject.keywordImpactos sociaispt_BR
dc.subject.keywordImpactos econômicospt_BR
dc.subject.keywordImpactos ambientaispt_BR
dc.subject.keywordProcesso decisóriopt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101360pt_BR
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214790X23001508?via%3Dihubpt_BR
dc.description.abstract1The disaster caused by the instability of rock salt mines in Maceio, ´ Brazil, is the largest ongoing worldwide socioenvironmental disaster in urban areas and has already affected approximately 60,000 families directly who needed to be relocated. To assess the negative impacts caused by this disaster, a Group Decision-Making (GDM) model was developed based on qualitative (Thematic Content Analysis) and quantitative (Nominal Group Technique) analysis. A comparative evaluation of the opinion of three groups of stakeholders was performed: two considered as experts, i.e., academic professors and local public agents, and a group of citizens directly affected by the disaster. As a result, the residents considered the relevance of the impacts in the three dimensions analyzed to be similar, while the experts gave greater importance to the social and economic dimensions than the environmental one. This study potentially contributes to society by guiding public policymakers in the decisionmaking process on mitigation and preventive actions, and academics interested in the governance of disasters caused by mining industries.pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-8311pt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departament of Mechanical Engineeringpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Alagoas, Department of Business Administrationpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Brasília, Department of Business Administrationpt_BR
dc.contributor.affiliationIslamic Azad University (IAU), Department of Civil Engineering, Garmsar Branch, Garmsar, Iranpt_BR
dc.description.unidadeFaculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Gestão de Políticas Públicas (FACE)pt_BR
dc.description.unidadeDepartamento de Administração (FACE ADM)pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.