Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/33646
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ARTIGO_DepositionParaguayanPresident .pdf1,12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The deposition of Paraguayan president Fernando Lugo and its repercussions in South American regional organizations
Authors: Jatobá, Daniel
Luciano, Bruno Theodoro
Assunto:: Paraguai. Presidente (2008- 2012 : Fernando Lugo)
MERCOSUL
União de Nações Sul-Americanas
Paraguai - política e governo
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
Citation: JATOBA, Daniel; LUCIANO, Bruno Theodoro. The Deposition of Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo and its repercussions in South American regional organizations. Bras. Brazilian Political Science Review, São Paulo, v. 12, n. 1, e0006, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800010006. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212018000100204&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 13 fev. 2019. Epub Mar 26, 2018.
Abstract: In June 2012, the Paraguayan Parliament executed a procedure that removed President Fernando Lugo from office. Since 1993, only two presidents have completed their mandates, Juan Carlos Wasmosy (1993-1998) and Nicanor Duarte Frutos (2003-2008). With the exception of the latter, all elected presidents have faced either successful or attempted coups, mostly organized by the military. In the case of Lugo, South American governments reacted by suspending Paraguay from two regional organizations (Unasur and Mercosur). This article has two main objectives: 01. to provide an interpretation of Fernando Lugo's deposition, in the context of the ongoing instability of Paraguay's democratic regime, as well as other similar cases in South America; and 02. to analyze the regional repercussions of the interruption of Lugo's presidential mandate, in particular the reactions from other South American governments and the ramifications for three Mercosur institutions: the Common Market Council (CMC), the Mercosur Parliament (Parlasur), and the Permanent Review Tribunal (TPR). It is argued that, despite the involvement of the parliamentary and judicial institutions of the bloc in the Paraguayan case, the governments have prevailed in both the suspension and reincorporation of Paraguay to the bloc, reinforcing both the intergovernmental nature of these regional initiatives and the prominence of national executives in regional decision-making.
metadata.dc.description.unidade: Instituto de Relações Internacionais (IREL)
Licença:: This publication is registered under a CC-BY Licence.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800010006
Appears in Collections:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Show full item record " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/jspui/handle/10482/33646/statistics">



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.