Title:	Mechanical and optical properties of conventional restorative glass-ionomer cements - a systematic review
Authors:	Menezes-Silva, Rafael Cabral, Renata Nunes Pascotto, Renata Corrêa Borges, Ana Flávia Sanches Martins, Carolina Castro Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima Sidhu, Sharanbir K. Leal, Soraya Coelho
metadata.dc.identifier.orcid:	http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0349-2050 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-1077
Assunto::	Cimentos dentários Cimentos dentários - propriedades mecânicas Cimentos dentários - propriedades ópticas Restauração (Odontologia)
Issue Date:	2019
Publisher:	Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
Citation:	MENEZES-SILVA, Rafael et al. Mechanical and optical properties of conventional restorative glass-ionomer cements - a systematic review. Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 27, e2018357, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0357. Disponível em: http://scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572019000100801. Acesso em: 23 jan. 2020.
Abstract:	Objectives To perform a systematic review of test methodologies on conventional restorative glass-ionomer cement (GIC) materials for mechanical and optical properties to compare the results between different GICs. Material and Methods Screening of titles and abstracts, data extraction, and quality assessments of full-texts were conducted in search for in vitro studies on conventional GICs that follow the relevant specifications of ISO standards regarding the following mechanical and optical properties: compressive strength, flexural strength, color, opacity and radiopacity. Sources The Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), Brazilian Bibliography of Dentistry (BBO) databases from Latin-American and Caribbean System on Health Sciences Information (BIREME) and PubMed/Medline (US National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health) databases were searched regardless of language. Altogether, 1146 in vitro studies were selected. Two reviewers independently selected and assessed the articles according to pre-established inclusion/exclusion criteria. Among all the properties investigated, only one study was classified as being of fair quality that tested compressive strength and was included. It was observed that many authors had not strictly followed ISO recommendations and that, for some properties (diametral tensile strength and microhardness), there are no guidelines provided. Conclusions It was not possible to compare the results for the mechanical and optical properties of conventional restorative GICs due to the lack of standardization of studies.
Licença::	(CC BY)
DOI:	https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0357
Appears in Collections:	Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.