Skip navigation
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/39729
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_RapidReviewMetaMetaAnalysis.pdf2 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Título: Rapid review and meta-meta-analysis of self-guided interventions to address anxiety, depression, and stress during COVID-19 social distancing
Autor(es): Fischer, Ronald
Bortolini, Tiago
Karl, Johannes Alfons
Zilberberg, Marcelo
Robinson, Kealagh
Rabelo, André Luiz Alves
Gemal, Lucas
Wegerhoff, Daniel
Nguyên, Thi Bảo Trâm
Irving, Briar
Chrystal, Megan
Mattos, Paulo
Assunto: Covid-19
Meta-análise
Intervenções autoguiadas
Depressão mental
Ansiedade
Cultura
Stress (Psicologia)
Bem-estar
Data de publicação: 28-Out-2020
Editora: Frontiers
Referência: FISCHER, Ronald et al. Rapid review and meta-meta-analysis of self-guided interventions to address anxiety, depression, and stress during COVID-19 social distancing. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, art. 563876, 28 out. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563876. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563876/full. Acesso em: 16 dez. 2020.
Abstract: We conducted a rapid review and quantitative summary of meta-analyses that have examined interventions which can be used by individuals during quarantine and social distancing to manage anxiety, depression, stress, and subjective well-being. A literature search yielded 34 meta-analyses (total number of studies k = 1,390, n = 145,744) that were summarized. Overall, self-guided interventions showed small to medium effects in comparison to control groups. In particular, self-guided therapeutic approaches (including cognitive-behavioral, mindfulness, and acceptance-based interventions), selected positive psychology interventions, and multi-component and activity-based interventions (music, physical exercise) showed promising evidence for effectiveness. Overall, self-guided interventions on average did not show the same degree of effectiveness as traditional guided individual or group therapies. There was no consistent evidence of dose effects, baseline differences, and differential effectiveness of eHealth interventions. More research on the effectiveness of interventions in diverse cultural settings is needed.
Licença: Copyright © 2020 Fischer, Bortolini, Karl, Zilberberg, Robinson, Rabelo, Gemal, Wegerhoff, Nguy˜ên, Irving, Chrystal and Mattos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563876
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins
UnB - Covid-19

Mostrar registro completo do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.