Titre:	Highly Cited Publications index (HCP) for individual evaluation : applications in Brazilian information metric studies
Auteur(s):	Maricato, João de Melo Santos, Priscila Rodrigues dos
metadata.dc.contributor.email:	mailto:jmmaricato@gmail.com mailto:priscilarssantos@outlook.com
metadata.dc.identifier.orcid:	https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-6866 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1897-8838
Assunto::	Bibliometria Estudos Métricos da Informação (EMI) Highly cited publications (HCP)
Date de publication:	2021
Editeur:	University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Référence bibliographique:	MARICATO, João Melo; SANTOS, Priscila Rodrigues dos. Highly Cited Publications index (HCP) for individual evaluation: applications in Brazilian information metric studies. Library Philosophy and Practice, art. 6394, 2021. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12160&context=libphilprac. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2022.
Abstract:	The use of different bibliometric indicators to analyze the individual scientific production of researchers constantly raises questions among several authors. Based on this problem, Waltman, Van Eck and Wouters (2013) propose a methodology that values highly cited papers (high impact) over low cited papers (low impact). To this end, the authors developed a stylized Highly Cited Publications (HCP) index aiming to minimize some limitations inherent to the metrics used to evaluate scientists. The present work proposes to carry out the empirical application of the HCP index stylized by the authors to researchers in the field of Information Metrics Studies (IMS) in Brazil in order to identify its potentialities and limitations. The research data was limited to 101 researchers in the area of IMS in Brazil, who had their production and citation data extracted from Google Citations in the month of July 2020, being evaluated different data sets in two distinct time periods (1941-2020 versus 2010-2020), for the purpose of comparative analysis, being possible to observe that according to Person's correlation, the use of different data sets, as long as they respect the same variables, do not show significant changes in the ranking of the researchers' HCP indexes. The use of the stylized HCP index is interesting for the identification of highly cited publications and can be used to complement the evaluation indicators, but it presents limitations that may inhibit its use, for example, the negative indexes of specific researchers.
metadata.dc.description.unidade:	Faculdade de Ciência da Informação (FCI)
Licença::	LPP Copyright Statement - The Author assigns to the Editors of Library Philosophy and Practice (LPP) the right to publish and distribute her/his manuscript as an electronic journal article. The assignment will be effective so long as LPP is available on computer networks. The Author will remain the sole owner of her/his manuscript and of the copyright in that manuscript. The Author may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was also published by LPP. LPP readers may copy or download the article resulting from the author’s manuscript from the network. Any distribution or publication of said article by readers will constitute an infringement of the Author’s copyright. The Author agrees to hold LPP blameless for any unauthorized use of the article by its readers. Fonte: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/copyright.html. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2022.
Collection(s) :	Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Tous les documents dans DSpace sont protégés par copyright, avec tous droits réservés.