Skip navigation
Veuillez utiliser cette adresse pour citer ce document : http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/46640
Fichier(s) constituant ce document :
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.
Titre: Health-related quality of life outcomes in head and neck cancer : results from a prospective, real-world data study with Brazilian patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy, conformal and conventional radiation techniques
Auteur(s): Santos, Marcos
Silva, Luís Felipe Oliveira e
Kohler, Hugo F.
Curioni, Otavio
Vilela, Ricardo
Fang, Marcel
Lima, Carmen Silvia Passos
Gomes, João Pedro
Chaves, Aline
Resende, Bruno
Trindade, Karine
Collares, Mauricio
Obs, Fernando
Brollo, Janaina
Cavalieri, Ronaldo
Ferreira, Ediane
Brust, Leandro
Ramos, Doralina do Amaral Rabello
Domenge, Christian
Kowalski, Luiz Paulo
metadata.dc.contributor.affiliation: EORTC Quality of Life Group, Head and Neck Tumors, Brussels, Belgium
Brasília University, Radiation therapy Department
Brasília University, Radiation therapy Department
AC Camargo Cancer Center–São Paulo
Hospital Heliópolis, São Paulo
Prevent Sênior, São Paulo
Brasília University, Radiation therapy Department
Prevent Sênior, São Paulo
University of Campinas, Oncology Department
University of Campinas, Oncology Department
Santa Casa de Bagé
Pontifícia Universidade Católica, Porto Alegre, Radiation therapy Department
Hospital Geral de Caxias do Sul
Oncobeda, Centro Integrado de Oncologia, Campos, RJ
Brasília University, Radiation therapy Department
Hospital Bruno Born, Lajeado, RS, Brazil
Brasília University, Radiation therapy Department
Société Franco-Brésilienne de Cancérologie, Nice, France
AC Camargo Cancer Center–São Paulo
Assunto:: Qualidade de vida
Saúde
Cabeça - câncer
Pescoço - câncer
Radioterapia
Date de publication: 21-sep-2020
Editeur: Elvsevier Inc.
Référence bibliographique: SANTOS, Marcos. Health-related quality of life outcomes in head and neck cancer: results from a prospective, real-world data study with Brazilian patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy, conformal and conventional radiation techniques. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, [S.l.], v. 109, n. 2, p. 485-494, 1 fev. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.044.
Abstract: Purpose: To compare global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and overall survival (OS) in patients with head and neck cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) or conventional ra- diation therapy (2DRT). Methods and Materials: In this real-world, multi-institutional and prospective study, HRQoL outcomes were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Head and Neck 43 (H&N43) questionnaires. Item response theory was used to generate a global HRQoL score, based on the 71 questions from both forms. The effect of treatment modality on HRQoL was studied using multivariate regression analyses. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meyer method, and groups were compared by the log-rank test. Results: Five hundred and seventy patients from 13 institutions were included. Median follow-up was 12.2 months. Concern- ing the radiation technique, 29.5% of the patients were treated with 2DRT, 43.7% received 3DCRT, and 26.8% were treated with IMRT. A higher proportion of patients receiving 2DRT had a treatment interruption of more than 5 days (69% vs 50.2% for 3DCRT and 42.5% for IMRT). IMRT had a statistically significant positive effect on HRQoL compared with 3DCRT (bZ 2.627, standard error Z 0.804, P Z .001) and 2DRT had a statistically significant negative effect compared with 3DCRT (bZ 5.075, standard error Z 0.926, P < .001). Patients receiving 2DRT presented a worse OS (P Z .01). There were no differences in OS when IMRT was compared with 3DCRT. Conclusions: IMRT provided better HRQoL than 3DCRT, which provided better HRQoL than 2DRT. Patients receiving 2DRT presented a worse OS, which might be related to more frequent treatment interruptions. Ó 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.044
metadata.dc.relation.publisherversion: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301620343467?via%3Dihub
Collection(s) :Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Affichage détaillé " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/jspui/handle/10482/46640/statistics">



Tous les documents dans DSpace sont protégés par copyright, avec tous droits réservés.