Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/50440
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Title: Systematic review of visual illusions in schizophrenia
Authors: Costa, Ana Luísa Lamounier
Costa, Dorcas Lamounier
Pessoa, Valdir Filgueiras
Caixeta, Fábio Viegas
Maior, Rafael Plakoudi Souto
metadata.dc.contributor.affiliation: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biology, Department of Physiological Sciences
Federal University of Piauí, Maternal and Childhood Department
University of Brasilia, Institute of Biology, Department of Physiological Sciences
University of Brasilia, Institute of Biology, Department of Physiological Sciences
University of Brasilia, Institute of Biology, Department of Physiological Sciences
Assunto:: Ilusões visuais
Esquizofrenia
Percepção visual
Revisão sistemática
Issue Date: 5-Jan-2023
Publisher: Elsevier B. V.
Citation: COSTA, Ana Luísa Lamounier et al. Systematic review of visual illusions in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, [S. l.], v. 252, p. 13-22, fev. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2022.12.030.
Abstract: Visual illusions have long been used as tools to investigate sensory-perceptual deficits in schizophrenia. Recent conflicting accounts have called into question the assumption of abnormal illusion perception in patients and, therefore, the validity of this approach. Here, we present a systematic review of the current evidence regarding visual illusion perception abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia. Relevant publications were identified by a systematic search of PubMed, Literatura LILACS, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), IBECS, BIOSIS, and Web of Science. Forty-five studies were selected which included illusions classified as ‘Motion illusions’, ‘Geometric-optical illusions’, ‘Illusory contours’, ‘Depth inversion illusion’, and ‘Non-specific’. There is concordant evidence of abnormal processing of illusions in patients for most categories, especially in facial Depth Inversion and Müller-Lyer illusions. There were significant methodological disparities and shortcomings, but risk of bias was overall low for individual studies. The usefulness of visual illusions as tools in clinical settings as well as in basic research may be contingent on significant methodological refinements.
metadata.dc.description.unidade: Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (IB)
Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas (IB CFS)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2022.12.030
metadata.dc.relation.publisherversion: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996422004777?via%3Dihub
Appears in Collections:Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Show full item record " class="statisticsLink btn btn-primary" href="/jspui/handle/10482/50440/statistics">



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.