Title:	Diferences in decisions afected by cognitive biases : examining human values, need for cognition, and numeracy
Authors:	Kakinohana, Regis Kichei Pilati, Ronaldo
metadata.dc.identifier.orcid:	https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9337-8990 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2982-5033
metadata.dc.contributor.affiliation:	University of Brasilia, Institute of Psychology University of Brasilia, Institute of Psychology
Assunto::	Processo decisório Vieses cognitivos Valores humanos Necessidade de cognição Numeracia
Issue Date:	7-Sep-2023
Publisher:	Springer Open
Citation:	KAKINOHANA, Regis K. Diferences in decisions afected by cognitive biases: examining human values, need for cognition, and numeracy. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, v. 36, p. 26, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-023-00265-z. Disponível em: https://prc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41155-023-00265-z.
Abstract:	A better understanding of factors that can afect preferences and choices may contribute to more accurate decision making. Several studies have investigated the efects of cognitive biases on decision-making and their relation ship with cognitive abilities and thinking dispositions. While studies on behaviour, attitude, personality, and health worries have examined their relationship with human values, research on cognitive bias has not investigated its relationship to individual diferences in human values. The purpose of this study was to explore individual diferences in biased choices, examining the relationships of the human values self-direction, conformity, power, and universal ism with the anchoring efect, the framing efect, the certainty efect, and the outcome bias, as well as the mediation of need for cognition and the moderation of numeracy in these relationships. We measured individual diferences and within-participant efects with an online questionnaire completed by 409 Brazilian participants, with an age range from 18 to 80 years, 56.7% female, and 43.3% male. The cognitive biases studied consistently infuenced choices and preferences. However, the biases showed distinct relationships with the individual diferences investigated, indicating the involvement of diverse psychological mechanisms. For example, people who value more self-direction were less afected only by anchoring. Hence, people more susceptible to one bias were not similarly susceptible to another. This can help in research on how to weaken or strengthen cognitive biases and heuristics.
metadata.dc.description.unidade:	Instituto de Psicologia (IP) Departamento de Psicologia Social e do Trabalho (IP PST)
metadata.dc.description.ppg:	Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social, do Trabalho e das Organizações
Licença::	© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
DOI:	https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-023-00265-z
Appears in Collections:	Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.